How Donor Communications Go Wrong
By Nicholas Nealon, Portlight Creative & Cause Culture
A colleague of mine leads feasibility studies for large nonprofit capital campaigns. His job is to regularly sit across from high-capacity donors and ask them candid questions about their experiences.
One day, over lunch, I asked him what donors say about the communication they receive from the nonprofits they support.
He smiled and said, "It's always one of two things."
First: "I don't hear from them very often."
Second: "When I do hear from them, they always ask me for more money."
I imagine this is exactly how my mom felt after I moved out for college (sorry, Mom!).
This feedback, from a large sample of high-capacity donors, is invaluable and highlights three common problems in donor communication.
Frequency
Goodwill
Framing
The first two are obvious, given the quotes about the lack of communication and constant donation requests, but the third is less intuitive and the most important.
Frequency is how often you're in contact with a donor. Most nonprofits I know have a monthly email cadence.
Goodwill is the currency that measures the value you've given your donors vs the value you've asked them to give you. If every piece of communication you send is an ask, your goodwill with your donors is low, and this is where donor fatigue really sets in.
Framing is the perspective you take when communicating with your audience. In this example, the nonprofits are talking to the donation, not the donor. That's bad framing.
Framing is the most important problem to fix, because if you fix it, the other two problems go away or get better on their own.
Let's focus on improving the first two points: frequency and goodwill. Please send a few extra emails and remove the "ask now" when appropriate. It's better, but if it still reads like an appeal to a checkbook, you have the same problem; you're just doing it more frequently.
But if you fix the framing and start speaking to the donor, not the donation, the way you write will change. The content will deliver more goodwill, and as you see results, you'll want to do more of it.
How it happens:
It's easy to understand. The pressure to fundraise is real. The calendar fills up with campaigns, events, and deadlines. Communication happens around all these moments, and those moments always involve an ask.
Here's the need → Here's what we're doing → Here's what your gift will accomplish → Here's the link.
That structure isn't wrong on its face. But it treats the reader as a funding source rather than a person. And donors can feel the difference, even when they can't name it.
The organization cares deeply, but the communication pattern suggests otherwise: I'll be in touch when I need something.
Over time, that pattern erodes the very relationship you're trying to build.
I get it. I've navigated this from both sides: as a Communications Director inside a nonprofit, and now as a consultant.
But I have also seen what happens when an organization deliberately changes this framing towards donors.
Over the past year, I watched them collectively raise roughly $300,000 more than in previous years. Not through bigger campaigns or larger lists. Through better relationships.
How to Fix it:
Your donor's aspirations come before their donation. Clarify the identity your donors aspire to achieve (it's likely very similar to who you aspire to be) and speak to that person.
Think about how the best consumer brands operate.
A company selling pocket knives doesn't spend much time talking about blades or steel. They publish content about being outdoors and endless adventure. Stories about the kind of person who knows how to build a fire and navigate a trail.
They're not selling a product. They're selling an identity—the lifestyle of someone capable, self-reliant, and daring. You don't buy the knife because of the knife; you buy it because you aspire to become the person who needs it.
It works because aspiration precedes action. People don't decide who they are after they make a purchase. They act because of who they already want to become.
The same principle applies to your donors.
Every person who gives to your organization is responding to who they aspire to be.
They aspire to be the kind of person who uses what they have to help others. They aspire to improve their community, give and expect nothing in return, and take a stand when others look away.
The donation is an expression of that aspirational identity.
When you only reach out to ask, you're writing to a donation, not the donor. You're skipping the person entirely — the aspirations, the values, the sense of purpose that connected them to your mission in the first place.
For donors rooted in faith, this goes even deeper:
For donors who give from a place of faith, the identity layer goes further still.
Their generosity flows from a conviction about stewardship and a belief that what they've been given is meant to be used for something beyond themselves. Their faith isn't just background detail. It's a core part of how they understand who they are and what they're here to do.
When you speak to that donor identity, you are inviting them to participate in work that aligns with their sense of calling. You're honoring the fullness of who they are. That's a different kind of communication. And it lands very differently.
Ways to do this:
Frequency - Optimize for finding partners, not collecting email addresses.
"Unsubscribes" hurt when we see them; it feels like a closed door, but "inactives" are actually worse. These are contacts who haven't opened anything from you in the last 6 months, and if you run that report, you'll likely be surprised by how many people there are.
These silent unsubs are worse because we have the hope that they are listening, when in fact they aren't.
Remember that growth comes from developing more partners, not a bigger email archive. You would take an email list of 100 engaged people over a list of 1,000 people who are rarely there for you, every single time.
So take a personal inventory: Are you using your email list to find partners or to protect your inactives?
Partners want to hear from you more than once a month because it's a relationship, not a transaction. You don't have to jump to 3 emails a week, but you'll benefit from going up from once a month. And I think you'll enjoy treating your emails as a conversation rather than as announcements.
If you have a list of over 2,500 contacts and so many events that you can't avoid asking for something, your focus should be on better audience segmentation. Because not everyone on your list needs to hear about everything, all the time.
Goodwill - Build goodwill leading up to the ask.
Yes, we have to ask for money. If you don't ask, you don't dance. We can't eliminate this, but we can prepare better.
Look at your calendar and find your next big moment, a gala, year-end, an event, fundraiser, etc. Now look at the number of weeks between now and then. This is where you build goodwill. Typically, this is the 30-90 days before you start selling tickets, open a fundraiser, or December 1st, etc.
This is where you fill the gaps in the silence between your monthly emails that make donors feel forgotten.
What does that look like? I like sending "Impact Snapshots." Short pieces of content about a quick win with no ask.
Image → Story or update (150 words) → "Thank you."
That's all. These are intentionally designed to give value to your donor. Share good news, something that happened this week, a quick update on how a donor's last gift is showing up in someone's life, or a win worth sharing. Just share it.
When you consistently give before you ask, something shifts. Donors stop feeling like targets of the next campaign and start feeling like partners in the work.
Then, when you do have something to ask for, the context is already there. You're not trying to remind people who you are, make an emotional case, and close a gift all in the same email. You're continuing a conversation that's already been going on.
Framing - Speak to the donor, not the donation.
Replace phrases like "Thank you for your donation." with "Thank you for being generous."
These subtle shifts make donors feel seen and affirm the aspirational identity they hold.
The earliest sign that this is working shows up in replies. Board members, donors, and long-time volunteers will reply with positive feedback. Things like "thank you!" "I loved this story." "Thanks for sharing!" etc…
This anecdotal proof comes before your open rates and click-through rates climb. And before the fundraiser numbers move. They're the signal that something real has started to happen.
The data follows. But the replies come first.
The posture underneath all of it:
We're not actually solving communication problems; we're solving relationship problems with better communication.
When you speak to the donor, not the donation, the writing, frequency, and relationship change.
You stop asking for donations and start issuing invitations. Those are different things. And the people who receive them respond differently.
Need Help?
If you want to improve your donor communications, subscribe to my newsletter for more help. https://cause-culture.com/
Need more help? Feel free to contact or engage with Nicholas directly:
Nicholas Nealon - Donor Communication Consultant: Nicholas@cause-culture.com
About The Author: Nicholas Nealon
About the Author
Nicholas Nealon is a communications strategist who helps nonprofit leaders clarify their message, reduce overwhelm, and tell stories that inspire generosity. A former Communications Director and board member, he brings more than a decade of experience in digital marketing and storytelling—including work acquired by University of Oxford—to help organizations move beyond noise and toward meaningful engagement.
He has led the development of communications systems from the ground up, helping teams eliminate bottlenecks, align messaging, and operate more effectively across departments. Today, Nicholas combines real-world experience with AI-powered tools to build practical, sustainable communications strategies that free leaders up to focus on mission while strengthening connections with their audiences.